Відео

The unofficial nickname for Skymont is Chadmont because of how much performance they have while still being low power.

very good move from intel, glad i bought an A770 :) 16GB

is it gonna cause games to crash like the last 2 gen of intel room heaters? look at al the bots in the comments too.

We don't need to know what is Lunar Lake, written from my new X Elite laptop

What he said is true. Typing from a legion 7i 2024😂

64 Cu gpu and 2ghz frequency it's seems to slow but 4150 time spy in graphic score. With or without tensor core??? BUT the idea of tensor core on igpu it fantastic. I don't know buy it or wait 2026

64 Cu and 2 hgz for gpu it's seems to slow but in leak the score is 4200 time spy graphics. How could it be? Hyper threading gpu?

Will the containment zone feature be available on Linux?

Congratulations. This is my favorite feature of LNL. The selection of behavior based on design target and software demand is a great step forward and will make this much more flexible! I, for one, really want to make an in car entertainment unit out of one. Bravo.

Is there any architecture that uses only E cores... I want 20 hours of business work nothing else.. That works well in low power and thermally doesn't fry in Hot areas like in India.. Thanks..

PC would be better without Microsoft.

why is this not out by july

does the thread director also do the core parking?

Amazing presentation. Very cool to see e\p core working effectively. Looking forward to see workload redist well across NPU and GPU in next gens.

Intel is back with vengeance !

Many thanks to Alejandro again for his questions and to Stephen for chatting with us! 👏😁 It was really interesting the question about the new front-end and Stephen's answer about how they have augmented it, employing three-decoder clusters with very little transistor penalty. It had always been said that, in the x86 architecture, it was unfeasible to scale the front-end to increase the instructions per cycle, but Stephen and his team have shown that it is possible through ingenious and efficient solutions. So, another x86 myth busted! Bravo team! 👏😁 Skymont will be deterministic for multi-threaded tasks scaling several E-core cores given their small footprint and optimized consumption. Cloud server processors come to mind. Also in the consumer market, assuming more prominence E-core for everyday tasks as Stephen says, which will result in lower consumption. It also opens the door to simplify the design by eliminating HyperThreading. Looking forward to the next iterations! Cheers team! 💪😁

It just doesn't work

Amazing progress. Thread director is gonna lift the already powerful and efficient Lunar lake to new heights.

Will OS Containment Zones and the rest of the features come to Linux either via a Kernel or Firmware update?

I love the effort Microsoft and Intel have put together in partnership to make Thread Director work with OS scheduling. Having hybrid hardware/software scheduler is smart engineering. I find this more impressive from an engineering perspective than the partnership of Qualcomm and Microsoft in PRISM on Windows on ARM. I love the direction we're seeing with Microsoft pushing Windows OS priority on efficiency with SOC design. Starting with efficiency then scaling up for performance is a better strategy. Lunar Lake is impressive and it has been a long time since I could say that about Intel

This is a mood lifter!

Good for My University Laboratory

Decade with weak chip, ditch by apple and then microsoft let's see if intel survive.

Three mistake your are doing is trying to copy ARM's power efficiency. You should focus on your strength and that is performance. Even if x86 takes more power, but it should perform twice or thrice better. That is where the problem is that it doesn't.

I have found out that whenever they let an Indian speaks for their product, It will flop hard Evidence: Meteor Lake

Thread Director doesn’t learn, it already knows from a pre-trained AI algorithm. Anyone remember Turbo Max 3.0?

User-mode scheduling (UMS) and apps which schedule their own threads/fibers or use Isolated User Mode / Thread local storage (TLS) (maybe thread pool API), is sounding as if this is about to require some level of recoding and optimization to support handling in process. Recompiling a few gazillion apps? I'm not so sure I like the sound of the implications!

disappointing.

Will it compete with m4 on single thread performance?

I wonder how many of the comments here are AI generated.

Intel should do a monolithic power management and thread director software package that handles EVERYTHING. Leaving too much to OEMs makes no sense with algorithms getting more advanced. Instead the whole software should be open source, so the industry, even AMD can standardize and iterate around these ideas, so that windows actually works. Doing a fragmented approach won't cut it against apple, as the api boundaries will become a limiting factor as chip architechtures and paradigms change faster and faster.

Intel should do a monolithic power management and thread director software package that handles EVERYTHING. Leaving too much to OEMs makes no sense with algorithms getting more advanced. Instead the whole software should be open source, so the industry, even AMD can standardize and iterate around these ideas, so that windows actually works. Doing a fragmented approach won't cut it against apple, as the api boundaries will become a limiting factor as chip architechtures and paradigms change faster and faster.

Intel is leaps ahead of the competition !

Thank you ❤

Thanks

I want arrow lake

Very informative, lots of "Goodness"!

OMG, it's overwhelming boring. Seriously, Intel, I watch each and every video you've launched on the channel. This is painful to watch. This should have been edited, showing highlights. Using a talking head focusing on improvements and use this live feed only as a complementary source. Yo Intel, you are a huge corp, don't you have some good editors?! You should hire me, cause if this is the best you got, I'm infinitely better editing. Infinitely as 10^ googolplex.

Hi Intel I find pinning processes to cores works better especialyl pinning low priority processes to coldest cores. Using Process Lasso. And for the presenter I recommend Creatine monhydrate.

Arrow when ?

I like her voice

When Lamborghini ???

i thought that was a really well conducted interview. really enjoyed it. cheers

Jealous of the A770! I could only find A750s for sale... but I do love it!

Skymont Look's good, I already want to see it in action. 🤤🤤😎

Qualcomm Lake

That’s great, now make it so the battery can last more than three minutes

Hey Kevin don't try spend too much money on trying to look as if you are interested in making a good impression. We like the slovenly appearance to give us the impression that you are spending all of you time trying to improve Intel products.

A little less conversation

Have Intel considered to replace the ring with a full mesh since there are only 5 clients (4P+1E-Cluster)? In my super sensitive gaming scenario I'm bothered by noisy ring issue - 13900K any busy P-core will make other cores "noisy". Also now E-core gets P-core level IPC, then what's the next main difference between them?